The Views of Educational Expert Assistants at Turkish Ministry of National Education about Organizational Values and Organizational Socialization

Güçlü, N., Çoban, Ö., Bozkurt, S., & Köksal, O.

Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to determine the views of Educational Expert Assistants at Ministry of National Education (TMoNE) about organizational Values and organizational socialization. The model is descriptive model the aim of which is to indicate the existent situation. The sample of the paper consists of 46 educational expert assistants at TMoNE. The scales, organizational values and organizational socialization, which were prepared by Zoba (2000) and validity and reliability of the scales were done by Mutlu (2008) were used in this research. The obtained data was analysed by using SPSS Program. Arithmetic mean, standard deviation and percentage were calculated to determine the views of educational expert assistants. Mann Whitney U was used to find out whether the views of educational expert assistants according to their sexes. To explain the correlation between organizational values and organizational socialization, correlation analyse was used. Besides this, regression analyse was used to find out the predictor whether organizational socialization has estimated organizational values or not. In the research, it was seen that new educational expert assistants accepted the organizational values and they treated organizational socialization behaviours. Their views weren’t different according to their sexes. There was no relationship between organizational values and organizational socialization. In addition to this, it was clearly concluded that organizational socialization didn’t estimate the organizational values meaningfully.

PDF

LINK

APA citation

  • Güçlü, N., Çoban, Ö., Bozkurt, S., & Köksal, O. (2014). The Views of Educational Expert Assistants at Turkish Ministry of National Education about Organizational Values and Organizational Socialization. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(1), 54–64.

Copyright © 2024 The International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, www.iises.net